Is Section 337 a criminal case?
Is IPC 337 cognizable offence or non-cognizable offence? IPC 337 is a Cognizable.
Who can complain under section 340 CrPC?
It is often claimed on behalf of a person against whom Court may initiating the proceedings in terms of Section 195(1)(b)/ 340 CrPC, that such “would-be accused” must be afforded an opportunity of hearing before any complaint is made to the Magistrate in terms of the said provision(s).
What is Section 91 CrPC India?
Sec. 91 of CrPC provides that a police officer or a court may, under certain circumstances, issue an order or a summons for the production of any document or thing if such production is necessary or desirable for the purpose of any investigation, INQUIRY, trial or other proceedings under the code.
What is the punishment for IPC 337?
—Whoever causes hurt to any person by doing any act so rashly or negligently as to endanger human life, or the personal safety of others, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees, or with both.
What Dafa 337?
337-B. Jurh: (1) Whoever causes on any part of the body of a person, other than the head or face, a hurt which leaves a mark of the wound, whether temporary or permanent,is said to cause jurh.
What is Section 345 CrPC?
(1) When any such offence as is described in section 175, section 178, section 179, section 180 or section 228 of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860 ), is committed in the view or presence of any Civil, Criminal or Revenue Court, the Court may cause the offender to be detained in custody and may, at any time before the …
What IPC 209?
Section 209 of the IPC provides for two years’ imprisonment and fine for the offence of fraudulently or dishonestly making a false claim in the court with the intent to injure or annoy any person.
What is Section 161 CRPC?
Section 161 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short ‘Cr. P.C.’) titled “Examination of witnesses by police” provides for oral examination of a person by any investigating officer when such person is supposed to be acquainted with the facts and circumstances of the case.
Why do we need CRPC?
On the other hand, the Criminal Procedure Code’s main motive is to provide for binding procedures that must be enacted during the administration of a criminal trial. The Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 provides for the courts and Magistrate’s powers, while the Indian Penal Code does not.
Is Section 279 a criminal case?
The offence punishable under section 279 of IPC is cognizable offence where the police has a right to arrest a person of an offence without a warrant, but such offences are bailable in nature and is triable by the Magistrate who is having the authority over the area wherein such offence has been committed.
Is IPC 338 bailable?
Is IPC 338 bailable or non-bailable offence? IPC 338 is a Bailable offence.
What is Section 22 A?
Section 22-A, Cr. P.C. gives power to the Sessions Judge to direct registration of case, in case of failure of the police official to discharge their statutory obligation as vested in them u/s 154, Cr. P.C. [2004 P.
What is the power of the CrPC in 367?
CrPC Section 367 – Power to direct further inquiry to be made or additional evidence to be taken | Devgan.in Cr.P.C 367, Power to direct further inquiry to be made or additional evidence to be taken, from the Code of Criminal Procedure, by Advocate Raman Devgan
What does 367 mean in the Code of Criminal Procedure?
Free for one month and pay only if you like it. 367. Power to direct further inquiry to be made or additional evidence to be taken.
What happens when death sentences are confirmed under CrPC?
Sub-section (1) of Section 367 of the CrPC provides that when the proceeding for confirmation of the death penalty is submitted to the High Court and it notices any point of innocence or guilt of the accused, it may either direct the Sessions Court or itself to make further inquiry into it or take additional evidence into consideration.
Are there any questions under Section 342 CrPC?
Kabir and others Vs. State 45 DLR 755. The accused appellant was asked questions during statement under section 342 CrPC with the preconceived notion that he was already found guilty under sections 395/397 of the Penal Code. This type of questions being against all norms of procedure of criminal jurisprudence are highly prejudicial to the accused.
