What is the meaning of Intermeddler?
(ĭn′tər-mĕd′l) intr.v. in·ter·med·dled, in·ter·med·dling, in·ter·med·dles. To interfere in the affairs of others, often officiously; meddle.
What is an officious meddler?
: one who unnecessarily meddles in the affairs of another and then seeks restitution or compensation for the beneficial results but who is barred from receiving it.
What is meant by quantum meruit?
Procedurally, quantum meruit is the name of a legal action brought to recover compensation for work done and labour performed “where no price has been agreed.”1 The term literally means “as much as is deserved”2 and often can be seen as the legal form of equitable compensation or restitution.
What does it mean to act officiously?
1 : volunteering one’s services where they are neither asked nor needed : meddlesome officious people who are always ready to offer unasked advice. 2 : informal, unofficial officious conversations between foreign ministers.
What does Intermeddle mean in the Bible?
: to meddle impertinently and officiously and usually so as to interfere.
Who is an Intermeddler in CPC?
‘Intermeddler’ as a Legal Representative under the Civil Procedure Code. Section 2 (11) of the Code of Civil Procedure defines ‘legal representative’ as a person, who in law, represents the estate of a deceased person, and includes any person that intermeddles with the estate of the deceased.
What is meant by quasi contract?
A quasi contract is a retroactive arrangement between two parties who have no previous obligations to one another. It is created by a judge to correct a circumstance in which one party acquires something at the expense of the other.
What is unjust enrichment in contract law?
Overview. Unjust enrichment occurs when Party A confers a benefit upon Party B without Party A receiving the proper restitution required by law. This typically occurs in a contractual agreement when Party A fulfills his/her part of the agreement and Party B does not fulfill his/her part of the agreement.
Who can file suit upon quantum meruit?
A claim of quantum meruit hence is a form of quasi contract. So, even if there is no legal written contract between two parties, the aggrieved party may file a suit upon quantum meruit on the basis of an implication in the agreement.
What is suit for quantum meruit with example?
Quantum meruit is a claim under quasi-contract. The remedy to a party in a breach of contract is the suit upon quantum meruit. The suit upon quantum meruit arises where a part of a contract is performed by one party and then there is a breach of contract or it is discovered that the contract is void or becomes void.
Which word from the sentences has almost the same meaning as interfere?
Frequently Asked Questions About interfere Some common synonyms of interfere are intercede, interpose, intervene, and mediate. While all these words mean “to come or go between,” interfere implies hindering.
Which is the best definition of an officious intermeddler?
officious intermeddler. n. a volunteer who assists and/or benefits another without contractual responsibility or legal duty to do so, but nevertheless wants compensation for his/her actions. The courts generally find that the intermeddler must rely on the equally voluntary gratitude of the recipient of the alleged benefit.
What is the difference between an officious intermeddler and a quasi contract?
The distinction between an officious intermeddler, and a party operating under a quasi-contract, is that the recipient of the goods or services has knowingly accepted the goods or services, with the intention of benefiting from them without providing compensation.
Is there any legal recourse for an intermeddler?
Therefore, no contract was made, and the intermeddler has no legal recourse to claim compensation. However, certain legal jurisdictions provide for an implied-by-law contract, called a quasi-contract, that exists solely for the purposes of remedying this unjust enrichment by giving a court legal means to enforce compensation.
How does the courts find the intermeddler to rely on?
The courts generally find that the intermeddler must rely on the equally voluntary gratitude of the recipient of the alleged benefit.
