Who is the true tragic hero in Julius Caesar?

Who is the true tragic hero in Julius Caesar?


How is Marcus Brutus a tragic hero?

Brutus is the tragic hero because he has all of the necessary traits a tragic hero needs, according to Aristotle. Aristotle defines a tragic hero as a man of noble stature or high position who causes his own destruction for a greater cause or principle. A flaw cannot be escaped, and Brutus discovers this the hard way.

What are Brutus heroic qualities?

Truly, Brutus is a tragic hero. He has the qualities of a hero, and he has a tragic flaw. He is an honorable, virtuous character who is destined for a downfall, a suffering or a defeat.

What are Brutus strengths?

Brutus’s strengths are that he is for the good of Rome and that he believes people are inherently “good”, per se. These unfortunately translate into his major character flaws such as his naiveté and failure to see through to the ulterior motives of people, specifically Cassius.

Why is Brutus a good leader?

Brutus would be an effective leader because he exhibits honor, trustworthiness, and patriotism. Brutus believes nothing should be done without honor, which he illustrates by killing Caesar publicly. Some would say killing for political reasons, is more honorable than killing someone for pure revenge.

What possible flaw might Brutus mindset suggest?

His tragic flaws are honor, poor judgement, and idealism (Bedell). In Shakespeare’s plays, the tragic hero and his flaws cause the downfall of the play (Tragic Flaws). In the play Julius Caesar, Cassius and the other conspirators take advantage of Brutus’ honor.

What is Brutus Hamartia?

In Julius Caesar, Brutus’s hamartia is his nobility, which makes him naive and prevents him from recognizing the conspirators’s selfish motives. His adherence to nobility makes him think the conspirators truly have the best interests of Rome at heart and are not just deposing Caesar for their own good.

Why is Cassius a good leader?

Cassius is shown to be more fit to lead Rome than Brutus and Antony because he remains strength in his beliefs while convincing others of them, yet he is not a power-hungry dictator. His decision to kill Caesar shows not only that he will not be a tyrannical leader, but that he is willing to take action when needed.

Which character in this act do you feel would make the best leader for Rome explain?

One could argue that Mark Antony would be the best ruler out of the three characters because he possesses several important leadership qualities and is not corrupted by his character flaws like Cassius and Brutus.

Previous post How do you write a book chapter in an essay?
Next post What is the most friendly font?